Pipeline run for this draft
Generated note
The linked item is a 2026 scientific paper, not a UN/IPCC admission. It says related high-emissions scenarios RCP8.5/SSP5-8.5 are now implausible. https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/2627/2026/ IPCC says scenarios are “not predictions” and have no likelihood attached. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/chapter-1/
Source post
🚨 BREAKING: UNITED NATION CLIMATE COMMITTEE JUST ADMITTED THEY WERE WRONG!!! Climate activists and politicians spent years treating the RCP8.5 climate scenario like an inevitable future, using it to justify fear-driven headlines and massive policy pushes 💰. Now many climate scientists admit it was a far-fetched worst-case scenario that became unrealistic as actual energy and emissions trends changed. ‘Trust the science.’ Science updates the model. ‘…not THAT science.’” https://t.co/EusITguMD7
Pipeline steps
17 steps- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✕
generate_note.pre_filter
- Started
- May 18, 2026, 20:54:04
- Finished
- May 18, 2026, 20:54:09
- Duration
- 4.76 s
Input snapshot
{
"post_text": "[Target Post]\n🚨 BREAKING: UNITED NATION CLIMATE COMMITTEE JUST ADMITTED THEY WERE WRONG!!! \n\nClimate activists and politicians spent years treating the RCP8.5 climate scenario like an inevitable future, using it to justify fear-driven headlines and massive policy pushes 💰. Now many climate scientists admit it was a far-fetched worst-case scenario that became unrealistic as actual energy and emissions trends changed.\n\n‘Trust the science.’\n\nScience updates the model.\n\n‘…not THAT science.’”\n https:"
}Output snapshot
{
"has_factual_claims": true
}