Pipeline run for this draft
Generated note
X rules prohibit attacking people because of religion, including claims that a religious group is dangerous. https://help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/hateful-conduct-policy The LA Times reported the judge apologized about jail suicide-watch conditions, not for the alleged attack. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2026-05-04/judge-asks-why-jail-placed-suspect-in-white-house-correspondents-dinner-attack-on-suicide-watch
Source post
There’s clearly still a lot of woke people working at X. I was notified that this tweet I posted about the judge who apologized to the attempted Trump assassin is a “violation of TOS” and now my followers are telling me they can’t see my tweets. How is calling out pro-Sharia law judges a violation? Meanwhile, Nazis and Islamic terrorists and Pakistani bots are on X and they say they love Hitler and post about how they want to kill Jews on a daily basis, and that’s allowed on this platform? @elonmusk please look into this. It shouldn’t be a violation to state the obvious.
Pipeline steps
16 steps- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
generate_note.pre_filter
- Started
- May 15, 2026, 12:14:32
- Finished
- May 15, 2026, 12:14:46
- Duration
- 13.75 s
Input snapshot
{
"post_text": "[Target Post]\nThere’s clearly still a lot of woke people working at X. I was notified that this tweet I posted about the judge who apologized to the attempted Trump assassin is a “violation of TOS” and now my followers are telling me they can’t see my tweets. \n\nHow is calling out pro-Sharia law judges a violation? Meanwhile, Nazis and Islamic terrorists and Pakistani bots are on X and they say they love Hitler and post about how they want to kill Jews on a daily basis, and that’s allowed on this"
}Output snapshot
{
"has_factual_claims": true
}