← All drafts
Draft #6901 Skipped Created May 12, 2026, 23:12:35

Pipeline run for this draft

Generated note

No note text was produced for this draft.

Source post

“how long have you been considering making this public?” “Oh too long”. Yeah, that’s not an answer. But let’s recap: Even if true, Thomas Massie had relations with a consenting adult in the wake of the death of his wife. Not a story. That said, I don’t believe anything about this story. It’s the Brett Kavanaugh nonsense. The Clarence Thomas nonsense. The E Jean Carroll nonsense. This woman looks unstable. Her demeanor looks unstable and deceitful. Her answers are vague. She waited “too long” and then decides to come forward a week before the primary with irrelevant accusations, even if true. It’s the same play over and over again. Everyone should understand that, even if you hate Massie. Though if you hate Massie, you are the target audience, and they are playing on your ignorance, bias, and stupidity to fall for the same old trick. I’d like to see that NDA. The timeline to sign it just came up a week before the primary, even though the alleged relations happened in 2024? Maybe we are missing some details, but that timeline doesn’t add up. Oh yeah, and she’s fearful it will hurt her run for school board
 If you are trying to appeal to the anti-Massie audience, this is exactly the type of accusation you would make while pretending to be “fearful” your “transparency” would hurt your campaign. I call bullcrap. Bookmark it and rub it in my face if I turn out to be wrong.

May 12, 2026, 15:27:47 Open on X →

Pipeline steps

1 step
  1. –
Step #1

generate_note

Skipped
Started
May 12, 2026, 23:12:35
Finished
May 12, 2026, 23:12:35
Duration
—

Input snapshot

(empty)

Output snapshot

{
  "reason": "has_video"
}