Pipeline run for this draft
Generated note
SpaceX described the recent event as the first 33-engine static fire for Super Heavy V3. FAA records of Starship pad damage refer to the April 20, 2023 flight, after which SpaceX reinforced the pad and added deluge infrastructure. https://x.com/SpaceX/status/2044590183761277386 https://www.faa.gov/media/72791
Source post
Main post: @elonmusk Before the latest Super Heavy static fire I called it: the pad deluge pipes weren’t going to handle full 33-engine pressure. @NASASpaceflight We went bigger & more powerful with the booster + Starship, but didn’t go higher with the tower or deluge — just made them more robust & bigger in capacity. @LabPadre In this video you can see the control building shake hard ~6 seconds after ignition. @Erdayastronaut That’s the pressure + Love/Rayleigh ground waves hammering the Mega Bay through the deluge system. Poles flying exactly like I predicted on replays. On a real launch or catch the engines are already climbing or being caught higher up — so pad/deluge take less direct hammer. @SpaceX These tests are giving the exact data we need before we scale the tower/pad height. @RGVaerialphotos Appreciate the rapid iteration — this is how we nail it. 🚀
Pipeline steps
7 steps- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✓
- ✕
- ✕
generate_note.pre_filter
- Started
- Apr 30, 2026, 18:11:10
- Finished
- Apr 30, 2026, 18:15:04
- Duration
- —
Input snapshot
{
"post_text": "[Target Post]\nMain post:\n@elonmusk\nBefore the latest Super Heavy static fire I called it: the pad deluge pipes weren’t going to handle full 33-engine pressure.\n@NASASpaceflight\nWe went bigger & more powerful with the booster + Starship, but didn’t go higher with the tower or deluge — just made them more robust & bigger in capacity.\n@LabPadre\nIn this video you can see the control building shake hard ~6 seconds after ignition. \n@Erdayastronaut\nThat’s the pressure + Love/Rayleigh ground waves hamme"
}Output snapshot
{
"has_factual_claims": true
}