← All drafts
Draft #12525 quality rejected Created May 30, 2026, 06:34:48

Pipeline run for this draft

Generated note

X Help says sharing a video by appending /video/1 surfaces attribution to the original uploader. The screenshot’s “From X” therefore does not, by itself, prove BPT directly uploaded the clip or disprove the broader alt-account claim. https://help.x.com/en/using-x/media-studio-faqs https://x.com/intcyberdigest/status/2060373582820114589

Source post

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: A 1.64M-follower verified account appears to be using a small alt account to sidestep X's new rules on reuploaded video. The method: a tiny "feeder" account takes another creator's clip, stamps their "BPT" watermark on it, and posts it first. Then, seconds later, the main account mirrors the exact same video. Lower-risk videos appear to go up directly on the main account. The riskier reuploads get routed through the alt first.

May 29, 2026, 14:51:55 Open on X →

Pipeline steps

11 steps
Step #1

generate_note.pre_filter

Success
Started
May 30, 2026, 06:34:48
Finished
May 30, 2026, 06:34:53
Duration
5.20 s

Input snapshot

{
  "post_text": "[Target Post]\n🚨 EXCLUSIVE: A 1.64M-follower verified account appears to be using a small alt account to sidestep X's new rules on reuploaded video.\n\nThe method: a tiny \"feeder\" account takes another creator's clip, stamps their \"BPT\" watermark on it, and posts it first. Then, seconds later, the main account mirrors the exact same video.\n\nLower-risk videos appear to go up directly on the main account. The riskier reuploads get routed through the alt first.\n(This post has 1 attached image(s))\n\n[Su"
}

Output snapshot

{
  "has_factual_claims": true
}